Cases 1 - 10 of 465
Fudge v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Defendant:
ODOC/Office-Pop-Mgr. Greg Jones, TRCI-Doc-Supt. T. Rumsey, TRCI-Doc-Supt. E. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Macejak v. Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) et al
as 2:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Macejak
Defendant:
ODOC Agency, SRCI Prison, Jamie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osejo v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Enrique Osejo
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182 Immigration & Nationality Act of 1990
Sheikhuna v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Awes Sheikhuna
Defendant:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watterson v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00732
Petitioner:
Elijah Watterson
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stratton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00667
Petitioner:
Jaime Michelle Stratton and Jared Michael Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00645
Petitioner:
Robert Vincent Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipska v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Christopher Ray Lipska and Christopher Ray Hare
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Case v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
David K. Case
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Chris Shupe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
