Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jackson v. MDOC Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility (WHV), et. al
as 2:2021cv11633
Plaintiff:
Traci Jackson
Defendant:
MDOC Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility (WHV), Daniel H Heyns, THOMAS FINCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
v. MDOC et al
as 2:2021cv11301
Defendant:
MDOC and Warden Millicent Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amira Salem, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 15-1694
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
AMIRA SALEM and KESHUNA ABCUMBY
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director at MDOC, THOMAS G. FINCO, Deputy Director MDOC and others
Amira Salem, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 15-1598
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMIRA SALEM and KESHUNA ABCUMBY
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director at MDOC, THOMAS G. FINCO, Deputy Director MDOC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv11194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amira Salem v. Millicent Warren, et al
as 14-1974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMIRA SALEM
Defendant - Appellee:
MILLICENT WARREN, CINDY GREENLEAF, DEAN BATKINS and others
Boyer et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv11503
Plaintiff:
Kathy Ann Boyer and James William Boyer
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H Heyns, Millicent Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salem et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv14567
Plaintiff:
Amira Salem and Keshuna Abcumby
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections , Daniel H. Heyns , THOMAS FINCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv13844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10864
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
