Cases 1 - 10 of 31
VISALDEN-DIAZ et al v. CASAS et al
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
ERIC A. VISALDEN-DIAZ, BRIONNE CUFF, TERRY STOCKS and others
Defendant:
MAXIM CASAS and BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLS v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2022cv06450
Plaintiff:
MR. KHALIL SALEEM MILLS
Defendant:
BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, OSCAR AVILES and WELL PATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MALTA et al
as 1:2022cv04191
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
DR. RAYMOND MALTA, DR. LISA R. MILLS, DR. SHERITY L. COLLIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRURY v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
as 1:2021cv15409
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DRURY
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, LISA RENEE MILLS, BRADLEY KAUFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARATINI v. POWELL et al
as 1:2021cv11061
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, SGT. D. SHEEHAN, SGT. D. CAIN and others
Plaintiff:
PETER L. CARATINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARATINI v. POWELL et al
as 1:2020cv08924
Defendant:
DAVID METELOW, ASST. SUPERINTENDENT LISA SWIFT, SCO. APRIL WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
PETER L. CARATINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMIREZ v. SWSP CUSTODY OFFICERS et al
as 1:2020cv03887
Plaintiff:
OSCAR PRIOR RAMIREZ
Defendant:
NP CHRISTINA CARMAN, JOHN DOE(S), SWSP MEDICAL DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALA v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 3:2020cv01361
Defendant:
SGT. DONLIN, CORRECTION OFFICER FINN, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SALA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WADE v. MILLS
as 1:2019cv21501
Defendant:
LISA L. MILLS, NP
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WADE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLS v. DIRECTOR OF TOLER HOUSE
as 2:2019cv21088
Petitioner:
ROBERT MILLS
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF TOLER HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
