Cases 11 - 20 of 32
NEAL v. POWELL et al
as 1:2017cv04768
Plaintiff:
MILTON NEAL
Defendant:
JOHN POWELL, D. WOOLSON, S. TRACEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILTON v. CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2016cv05887
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MILTON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLAUGHTER et al v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv08327
Plaintiff:
CHARLES S. SLAUGHTER, THOMAS LIDDELL, SHANE SIMPSON and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, STEPHEN SWEENEY, VINCENT PRIETO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAULINO et al, v. HOLT, et al.,
as 3:2015cv00538
Petitioner:
JOAN PAULINO, ALBERT W. FLORENCE, JERRY T. GRANT and others
Respondent:
HOLT, TONY MACK, ROBERT E. ANDREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VALES v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2014cv00659
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY MILTON VALES
Respondent:
JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WHITLOCK et al V. NJDOC
as 2:2013cv05130
Plaintiff:
MILTON WHITLOCK and FRED S. LEHMANN
Defendant:
NJDOC and NORTHEN STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. OLDROYD
as 1:2013cv03182
Plaintiff:
MILTON MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL OLDROYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VALES v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2013cv03027
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY MILTON VALES
Respondent:
JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HERNANDEZ v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2013cv01156
Plaintiff:
MILTON HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH and DONNA ZICKFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDER v. BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR et al
as 2:2012cv07313
Plaintiff:
MILTON RIDER
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
