Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Jones v. Richard et al
as 5:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lee Jones
Defendant:
Li Richard, Mims Gregory, D. Wangoner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06943
Plaintiff:
JASON GREGORY MIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02252
Plaintiff:
NATHAN MIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49804
Plaintiff:
JAYME L MIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49218
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46069
Plaintiff:
JESSICA L MIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35289
Plaintiff:
LARRY MIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Doe et al
as 5:2021cv00364
Plaintiff:
Rachel R Graham
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, Anthony Mims, Ron Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22369
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO R MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
