Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HF Foods Group Inc. vs Maodong Xu, et al
as 2:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
HF Foods Group Inc.
Defendant:
Maodong Xu, Zhou Min Ni, Fai Lam and others
Rullan et al v. Rhee et al
as 2:2022cv00597
Defendant:
Jong Min Rhee, Lusso Auto, LLC doing business as Lusso Auto Spa & Design also known as Lusso Auto Design, John Lusso and others
Plaintiff:
Aljoshua Rullan and Cheryl Rullan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Townsend et al v. Nevada State Contractors Board et al
as 2:2017cv02507
Defendant:
Chen Min Juan and Nevada State Contractors Board
Plaintiff:
T.L. Townsend Builders, LLC and Tommie Lee Townsend, II
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Not Used
as 2:2017cv02506
Defendant:
CHEN MIN JUAN, Nevada State Contractors Board and TOMMIE LEE TOWNSEND, II
Plaintiff:
T.L. TOWNSEND BUILDERS, LLC, dba Townco Construction Group
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00625
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chang v. Coffee et al
as 2:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Min Soon Chang
Defendant:
Scott L Coffee and Philip J Kohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2009cv01681
Plaintiff:
Min Hui Lee
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company and American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rueth et al v. State Of Nevada
as 2:2009cv00863
Plaintiff:
Michael Rueth and Blue Water Diamond Minning
Defendant:
State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Min v. Okin et al
as 2:2007cv00526
Defendant:
Robert J Okin, Michael Chertoff, Robert Mueller and others
Plaintiff:
Lu Min
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
