Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Miykael Muhammad v. City of Chicago, et al
as 15-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIYKAEL MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, WILLIAM P. DUNN and JOHN MCGUIRE, Officer
Muhammad v. Nixa et al
as 1:2015cv04069
Plaintiff:
Miykael Muhammad
Defendant:
Daniel Nixa, John McGuire, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Iyantlza et al
as 1:2015cv03680
Plaintiff:
Miykael Muhammad
Defendant:
Deputy Iyantlza, Toni Preckwinckle and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miykael Muhammad v. Anjanette Jesse, et al
as 15-1044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIYKAEL MUHAMMAD, Minister, formerly known through involuntary servitude as Michael Gardner
Defendant - Appellee:
ANJANETTE JESSE, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHCARE AND FAMILY SERVICES, MARY MILLER and others
Miykael Muhammad v. John Moore, et al
as 14-3291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIYKAEL MUHAMMAD, Minister, formerly known as MICHAEL GARDNER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN B. MOORE, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA, JEFFREY MCCRACKEN, Officer and others
In Re Miykael Muhammad and Ada Gardner
as 1:2014cv00695
Plaintiff:
Miykael Muhammad and Ada Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Miykael Muhammad v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 14-2404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIYKAEL MUHAMMAD, also known as MICHAEL GARDNER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and TIMOTHY C. EVANS
Muhammad et al v. Moore et al
as 2:2014cv02081
Plaintiff:
Miykael Muhammad and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
Defendant:
John Brooks Moore, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Police Department, University of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad et al v. Bates et al
as 2:2014cv02058
Plaintiff:
Miykael Muhammad and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
Defendant:
Nameka Bates, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Police Department, University of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
