Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund et al v. Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency et al
as 1:2015cv05807
Plaintiff:
Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund , Erie County Employees' Retirement System and Lackawanna County Employees' Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Bank of Nova Scotia , Barclays Capital Inc. , BMO Capital Markets Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In re American Capital Realties Litigation
as 1:2015cv00421
Defendant:
American Capital Realties Litigation, American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., Arc Properties Operating Partnership L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, College Retirement Equities Fund, Tiaa-Cref Equity Index Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
New York City Employees Retirement System et al v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00422
Plaintiff:
New York City Employees Retirement System , New York City Police Pension Fund , New York City Police Officers' Variable Supplements Fund and others
Defendant:
American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., ARC Properties Operating Partnership, Nicholas S. Schorsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
The City Of Tampa General Employees Retirement Fund v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10134
Plaintiff:
The City Of Tampa General Employees Retirement Fund
Defendant:
American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., Nicholas S. Schorsch, David S. Kay and others
Movant:
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In Re: General Electric Co. Se
as 13-3763
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State Universities Retirement System of Illinois, Karen A. Christiansen, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Benson Duruaku and others
Appellant:
Clark Hampe
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Immelt, Brackett B. Denniston, III, Pamela Daley and others
U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Mizuho Securities USA Inc.
as 1:2012cv05550
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Mizuho Securities USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Fuld et al
as 1:2011cv03892
Plaintiff:
State Compensation Insurance Fund
Defendant:
Richard S. Fuld, Christopher M. O'Meara, Erin M. Callan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc
as 11-1589
Plaintiff:
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, Life Enrichment Foundation, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Alan Maltzman and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Miriam Loveman
Defendant:
Peter Stingi, John and Jane Doe 1, John and Jane Does 2 through 10 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Stanley O'Neal, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Ahmass L. Fakahany and others
The California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Fuld et al
as 1:2011cv01281
Plaintiff:
The California Public Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Richard S. Fuld, Jr., Christopher M. O'Meara, Erin M. Callan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00733
Plaintiff:
Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and Patricia Grossberg Living Trust
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, William P. Boardman, Frank Paul Bramble, Sr and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Countrywide Financial Corporation, Kenneth D Lewis and Joseph L. Price
Petitioner:
Sjunde Ap-Fonden, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, KBC Asset Management NV and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Gaia Holdings Ltd.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, UBS Securities LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Comptroller of the Currency, OCC, US Treasury Dept. and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its Corporate capacity
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
