Cases 1 - 10 of 48
USA v. Mohamad Shnewer
as 23-2721
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MOHAMAD IBRAHIM SHNEWER
Mohamad Rizal v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2270
Petitioner:
MOHAMAD RIZAL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00943
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Dixon v. iRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01307
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin Angle, Mohamad Ali and others
Trenton Threatened Skies Inc, et al v. FAA, et al
as 22-1965
Petitioner:
TRENTON THREATENED SKIES INC, BOROUGH OF YARDLEY, Pennsylvania, TOWNSHIP OF LOWER MAKEFIELD, Pennsylvania and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, BILLY NOLEN, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv17095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANDERSON-NEAL et al v. LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv02755
Plaintiff:
SHEILA ANDERSON-NEAL, MOHAMED KAMARA and MOHAMAD KAMARA
Defendant:
LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
