Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mohammed Jibril, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 23-5074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mohammed Jibril, individually, and on behalf of their minor children H.J., Y.J., and O.J., Aida Shahin, individually, and on behalf of their minor children H.J., Y.J., and O.J., Ala'a Jibril, individually and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, David P. Pekoske, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, Troy Miller, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Mohammed Jibril, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-5202
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, David P. Pekoske, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ala'a Jibril, individually, Mohammed Jibril, individually, and on behalf of their minor children Y.J., and O.J., Aida Shahin, individually, and on behalf of their minor children Y.J., and O.J. and others
JIBRIL et al v. MCALEENAN et al
as 1:2019cv02457
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Jibril, Khalid Jibril, Ala'a Jibril and others
Defendant:
CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Acting Commissioner MARK MORGAN, DAVID P. PEKOSKE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01674
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
