Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mohamed Abbas v. William Barr
as 19-71664
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
MOHAMED KAMAL ELDIN ABBAS
Agapito v. Amir Ram Bagels, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08079
Defendant:
Imanuel Halon, Tal On 1st Inc., Amir Ram and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Agapito
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Islam v. LX Avenue Bagels, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04895
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Islam
Defendant:
LX Avenue Bagels, Inc., Amir Ram Bagels, Inc., Tal on 1st, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garcia v. Tal On 1ST Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09042
Plaintiff:
Victor Garcia
Defendant:
Tal On 1ST Inc., Mohammed Kamal, Robert Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mohamed Abbas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71555
Petitioner:
MOHAMED KAMAL ELDIN ABBAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
KAMAL v. HOLDER
as 4:2009cv00443
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED KAMAL
Respondent:
ERIC H HOLDER, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mohammed Hossain v. Commonwealth of the Northern M, et al
as 08-17754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED KAMAL HOSSAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, MATTHEW THEODORE GREGORY, I and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hossain v. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands et al
as 1:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Kamal Hossain
Defendant:
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Matthew T. Gregory and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kamal v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00973
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Kamal
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey and Emilio T Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
