Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe v. Becerra, et al.
as 24-332
Petitioner:
JOHN DOE
Respondent:
MOISES BECERRA, Field Office Director of the San Francisco Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06462
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06362
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jimenez et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2023cv06353
Plaintiff:
Victor Jimenez and Jorge Mutzutz
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Patrick Lechleitner and Moises Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rosas Rosas v. Becerra, et al.
as 23-4013
Petitioner:
OLIVER ROSAS ROSAS
Respondent:
MOISES BECERRA, PATRICK LECHLEITNER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
