Cases 1 - 6 of 6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $155,550.00 IN MONEY ORDERS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$155,550.00 IN MONEY ORDERS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $100,000.00 IN MONEY ORDERS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$100,000.00 IN MONEY ORDERS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Western Union Money Order # 17-869081175 in the amount of $1,000.00 et al
as 2:2019cv00407
Defendant:
$10,450.00 in U.S. Currency,Western Union Money Order # 17-869081175 in the amount of $1,000.00; Western UnionMoney Order # 17-970415992 in the amount of $1,000.00; Western U, Postal Money Order #25713540077 in the amount of $1,000.00, Western Union Money Order # 17-972805458 in the amount of $1,000.00 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $40,990.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY; and 10 MONEY ORDERS TOTALING $6,000.00
as 1:2018cv01907
Defendant:
$40,990.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY; and 10 MONEY ORDERS TOTALING $6,000.00
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FIFTEEN (15) POSTAL SERVICE MONEY ORDERS VALUED AT $14,440.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2018cv01630
Defendant:
FIFTEEN (15) POSTAL SERVICE MONEY ORDERS VALUED AT $14,440.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FOUR MONEY ORDERS TOTALING $10,000
as 1:2018cv00301
Defendant:
FOUR MONEY ORDERS TOTALING $10,000
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
