Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Amaral-Montalvo v. High Desert State Prison Warden
as 3:2023cv06525
Petitioner:
Albaro Amaral-Montalvo
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jaime Montalvo Ruiz v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv06792
Petitioner:
Jaime Montalvo Ruiz
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pablo Cesar Montalvo Jacinto v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04589
Plaintiff:
Pablo Cesar Montalvo Jacinto
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 10, incusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Pablo Cesar Montalvo Jacinto v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Pablo Cesar Montalvo Jacinto
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 10, incusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Montalvo v. Hyundai Motor America
as 3:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
David Montalvo
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
Montalvo v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2022cv04719
Plaintiff:
Luis Andres Montalvo
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez and E. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Montalvo v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2022cv01422
Plaintiff:
Luis Andres Montalvo
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez and E Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04982
Plaintiff:
Bob Williams, Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Moultrie et al v. The Bridge Luxury Apartment
as 3:2021cv05025
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Montalvo and Aaron Shawn Moultrie
Defendant:
The Bridge Luxury Apartment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
