Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones et al v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Defendant:
Nancy Foote, Lisa Houck, Bureau For Conflict Prevention and Stabilization and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Stephen Hulse and Kalie Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones-Hulse et al v. Aver Health et al
as 2:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Kalie Jones-Hulse and Nicholas Hulse
Defendant:
Viral Mennon, Elizabeth Allred, PPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clawson et al v. Villas at the Country Club Owners Association et al
as 2:2021cv00325
Defendant:
Dicksy Rhoads, David Starling, Advantage Management & Real Estate Services and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Myer, Catherine Myer and Charvel Clawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Moody v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00548
Plaintiff:
Jara J. Moody
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Prigge v. Romney et al
as 2:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Diane R. Prigge
Defendant:
V. Romney, Clark Boulton, Shannon Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Savage v. Roberts et al
as 2:2016cv00341
Plaintiff:
Jed Nelson Savage
Defendant:
Chris Roberts, Michael Garcia and FNU Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sure Tec Insurance v. Enlightened et al
as 2:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Sure Tec Insurance
Defendant:
Enlightened, Colton Moody, Cristy Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Robson et al
as 2:2007cv00643
Plaintiff:
David Young
Defendant:
Kevin Robson, Daniel Bertch, Bertch & Birch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
