Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Moody v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Moody
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moodie v. Sams East Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Candace Moodie
Defendant:
Sams East Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Moody v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Kelly Wood and Kelly Moody
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Burgess et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Victoria Ann Burgess, Elizabeth F Johnson, Clark Walker Johnson and others
Defendant:
Howard Mitchell Johnson, HMJMOJ LLC, MOJ/HMJ LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moody v. Dowling
as 5:2020cv00696
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Petitioner:
Nicholas F Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Hillman et al
as 5:2020cv00584
Defendant:
Codilis Moody & Circelli PC, Shawn R Hillmam, PHH Mortgage Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Anna Estevez, John Smithee, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Moody v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Moody
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moody v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2019cv00413
Plaintiff:
Steven Moody, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
