Cases 1 - 10 of 836
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03352
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03299
Plaintiff:
Monique Moore
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilkinson et al v. City of Dayton Ohio et al
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA WILKINSON, Keeley Nelson, Darlene Guynn and others
Defendant:
City of Dayton Ohio, Kamron Afzal, Officer Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moore v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Shevonne Moore
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03016
Plaintiff:
Barbara Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Augustus
as 1:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
Darryl D. Moore, Sr.
Defendant:
Davyon Augustus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02776
Plaintiff:
Shane Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02586
Plaintiff:
Rosa Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02547
Plaintiff:
Valda Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
