Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Stidwell v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16672
Plaintiff:
Devon Stidwell
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Terry Hake, Shawn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03076
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cintron, Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haick et al v. Moreci et al
as 2:2020cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Haick and Don Handfield
Defendant:
Gary Dauberman, Vault Media Holdings, LLC and michael Moreci
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Anderson v. Tenort et al
as 1:2017cv02557
Plaintiff:
Allante N Anderson
Defendant:
Officer Tenort, Superintendent Jones and Director Moreci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv07523
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Johnson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Nneka Jones Tapia, John Jay Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leyva v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2015cv09092
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Leyva
Defendant:
County of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, Daniel Moreci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Roberto's Ristorante & Pizzeria, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08358
Plaintiff:
Pedro Castillo
Defendant:
Roberto's Ristorante & Pizzeria, Inc. and Vito Moreci
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Arroyo v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv06814
Plaintiff:
Jose F. Arroyo
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Cook County Board Of Commissioners, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv03297
Plaintiff:
Jose F. Arroyo
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Cook County Board Of Commissioners, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv02015
Plaintiff:
Michael Pryor
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Tom Dart, Daniel Moreci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
