Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lashon Jacks, et al v. DirectSat USA, LLC, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LASHON JACKS, MORRIE BELL and ERRICK RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTSAT USA, LLC, UNITEK USA, , LLC, JAY HEABERLIN and others
Lashon Jacks, et al v. DirectSat USA, LLC, et al
as 22-8006
Petitioner:
LASHON JACKS, MORRIE BELL and ERRICK RHODES
Respondent:
DIRECTSAT USA, LLC, UNITEK USA, , LLC, JAY HEABERLIN and others
Araica et al v. PCL Industrial Construction Company
as 1:2014cv00041
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Araica , All Plaintiffs , Nicasio Maldonado Davalos and others
Defendant:
PCL Industrial Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Abrego et al v. A & L Industrial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00414
Defendant:
Abclean Inc formerly doing business as ABCLEAN Industrial Services, Inc also known as ABCLEAN, INC., UP Professional Solutions LLC, Brock Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bonita Faya Nelson, Vicente Gracia, Freddy Mireles and others
Petitioner:
Motiva Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DirectSat USA, LLC, et al v. Morrie Bell, et al
as 12-8038
Petitioner:
DIRECTSAT USA, LLC, UNITEK USA, JAY HEABERLIN and others
Respondent:
MORRIE BELL, ERRICK RHODES and LASHON JACKS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Jacks et al v. DirectSat USA, LLC. et al
as 1:2010cv01707
Plaintiff:
Lashon Jacks, Morrie Bell and Errick Rhodes
Defendant:
DirectSat USA, LLC. , Unitek USA, LLC , Jay Heaberlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Morris Bell v. A.o. Smith Elecrical Products Co, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-70369
Defendant:
A.o. Smith Elecrical Products Co
Plaintiff:
Morris Bell
Harrel, et al v. Veneman, et al
as 2:2003cv00115
Plaintiff:
Welpha Harrel, Jr., James Alexander, Annie Arnold and others
Defendant:
Anne Veneman, John D. Ashcroft and David P. York
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
