Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Steele v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024ct03081
Plaintiff:
Colell B. Steele and Colell Barion Steele
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Davis et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
B. Morris and L. Davis
Plaintiff:
Eli Alvarez
Allen v. Taylor et al
as 1:2017cv00228
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D. Allen
Defendant:
FNU Taylor, Morris R. McDaniels, Jeffery James and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Foust v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015ct03171
Plaintiff:
Theodore Morris Foust
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Congress and United States Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015ct03082
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Neuse Correctional Institution, Morris Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mizell v. Reid et al
as 5:2014ct03289
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Mizell
Defendant:
Morris Reid, William L. Burden, Jr., Tonya Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. City of Windsor et al
as 5:2014ct03069
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
City of Windsor, County of Bertie, District Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
William Henry Morris
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department and Alex Saine
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Queen City Bonding et al
as 3:2013cv00525
Plaintiff:
William Henry Morris
Defendant:
Queen City Bonding and No Limit Bail Bonding
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Foust v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2013ct03178
Plaintiff:
Theodore Morris Foust
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
