Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SWINNEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2020cv02316
Defendant:
BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY, BANK MELLI IRAN and others
Plaintiff:
KWAN JOHNSON, ROBERT CHELONE, VLADIMIR QUERALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
LEXON INSURANCE COMPANY v. FAIRCLOTH JR et al
as 1:2020cv01057
Defendant:
CRC TRANSPORT LLC, STATE WIDE TRANSPORTATION INC, APEX CAPITAL CORP and others
Plaintiff:
LEXON INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORROW v. USA
as 1:2016cv01295
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MIGUEL MORROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MORROW v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2016cv00608
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KEITH MORROW
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ESTES et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2016cv00450
Plaintiff:
RON ESTES , RICHARD SATTGAST , JOHN NEELY KENNEDY and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE, JACOB LEW and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MORROW v. USA
as 1:2012cv01323
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MIGUEL MORROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SPENCER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
KENNETH S. SPENCER, JR. , FRANCES A. SPENCER , AMY L. MORROW and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
MORROW v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2010cv00823
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. MORROW
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORROW v. BARNES et al
as 1:2010cv00716
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. MORROW
Defendant:
SEAN BARNES, JAMES COLLIER, DENISE SAXTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2009cv02107
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
