Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way Over Land in Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Additional Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Bedford County Tennessee, and, Manuel Quinonez Silvestre, PennyMac Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tree-Removal Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Knox County Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Knox County Tennessee, Dennis H. Mayton, Carolyn F. Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
United States of America et al v. Tree-Removal Rights And Additional Easement Rights With Respect To Preexisting Easement And Right-of-Way Over Land In Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00450
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Defendant:
Kerry Webb, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Tree-Removal Rights And Additional Easement Rights With Respect To Preexisting Easement And Right-of-Way Over Land In Davidson County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Tree-Removal Rights And Additional Easement Rights With Respect To Preexisting Easement And Right-of-Way Over Land In Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Christopher C. Pirtle, Christopher Charles Pirtle, Geoff Post and others
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Davidson County, Tennessee, Roushi Pazouki, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00364
Defendant:
Hugh M. Queener, Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Davidson County, Tennessee, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01221
Trustee:
J. Phillip Jones
Defendant:
Christopher C. McClure III, Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in McNairy County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2015cv01008
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in McNairy County, Tennessee, Bobby Haynes, Mary Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
United States of America et al v. Keith et al (TV3)
as 3:2013cv00520
Defendant:
Tammy A Keith, Claude E Keith, Jr., Citifinancial Mortgage Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
