Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Mota v. Southern Tire Mart, LLC
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
Southern Tire Mart, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eric Mota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ibarra al v. Cornelius et al
as 4:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
PEDRO IBARRA and LUCERO DE LEON MOTA
Defendant:
Jeffrey Cornelius and JETFASTCHARGER DISTRIBUTORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mota v. National Union Five Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Eric Mota
Defendant:
National Union Five Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. d/b/a AIG Prpoerty Casualty Company and National Union Five Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. doing business as AIG Property Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00265
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arredondo v. Jett et al
as 6:2019cv00470
Defendant:
Correctional Officer FNU Robinson, Victor Y. Afun, Sgt. Daniel R. Jett and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Arredondo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mota v. Beacon Bay Asset Managment LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01862
Plaintiff:
Annmarie Mota
Defendant:
Beacon Bay Asset Managment LLC , James Virgil Willis and Glenn Klupsak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mota v. National Union Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Mota
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sola v. Umbrella Surgical Support, LC et al
as 4:2016cv03258
Plaintiff:
Edwin Sola
Defendant:
Umbrella Surgical Support, LC, Estuardo A. Mota and Valta Industries Inc. d/b/a Professional Surgical Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bravo v. Umbrella Surgical Support, LC et al
as 4:2016cv02403
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Jose Bravo
Defendant:
Umbrella Surgical Support, LC and Estuardo A. Mota
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
