Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 9.89 Acres of Land
as 23-2129
Plaintiff / Appellee: MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: 9.89 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY ELIZABETH LEE TERRY, a/k/a Elizabeth Lee Reynolds, a/k/a Elizabeth Terry Reynolds, Roanoke County Tax Map Parcel No. 110 00-0000 and Being MVP Parcel No. VA-RO-054
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.32 Acres of Land
as 23-1935
Plaintiff / Appellee: MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: 0.32 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY GRACE MINOR TERRY, Roanoke County Tax Map Parcel No. 102 02-0000 and Being MVP Parcel No. VA-RO-5149 (AR RO-279.01)
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 8.37 Acres of Land, Owned by Frank H. Terry, Jr.,
as 23-1532
Plaintiff / Appellee: MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: 8.37 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY FRANK H. TERRY, JR., JOHN COLES TERRY, III, AND ELIZABETH LEE TERRY ALSO KNOWN AS ELIZABETH LEE REYNOLDS ROANOKE COUNTY TAX MAP PARCEL NO. 102 00-0000 AND BEING MVP PARCEL NO. VA-RO-046
Defendant: CHARLES MALCOLM LOLLAR, SR.
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.19 Acres of Land, Owned By Cletus Woodrow Bohon
as 23-1348
Plaintiff / Appellee: MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: 0.19 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY CLETUS WOODROW BOHON AND BEVERLY ANN BOHON, Montgomery County Tax Map Parcel No. 030271 and Being MVP Parcel No. VA-MN-5233 (AR MN-278.01) and 2.74 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY CLETUS WOODROW BOHON AND BEVERLY ANN BOHON, Montgomery County Tax Map Parcel No. 017761 and Being MVP Parcel No. VA-MO-022
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Ann C. Clements and Mary Arrington Clements We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00321
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 3.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Ann C. Clements and Mary Arrington Clements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.335 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones et al
as 7:2022cv00331
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.335 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones and 2.01 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.21 Acres of Land, Owned by William J. Correll, Sr. and Nadine E. Correll et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00333
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.21 Acres of Land, Owned by William J. Correll, Sr. and Nadine E. Correll and 0.11 Acres of Land, Owned by William J. Correll, Sr. and Nadine E. Correll
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.15 Acres of Land, Owned by Russell R. Barksdale, Jr.
as 7:2022cv00322
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.15 Acres of Land, Owned by Russell R. Barksdale, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.09 Acres of Land, Owned by Larry Bernard Cunningham and Carolyn A. Cunningham et al
as 7:2022cv00332
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.09 Acres of Land, Owned by Larry Bernard Cunningham and Carolyn A. Cunningham and 0.26 Acres of Land, Owned by Larry Bernard Cunningham and Carolyn A. Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.83 Acres of Land, Owned by Kathleen M. Vanderhyde, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.83 Acres of Land, Owned by Kathleen M. Vanderhyde, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.65 Acres of Land, Owned by Kathleen M. Vanderhyde, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.6603 Acres of Land, Owned by Kathleen M. Vanderhyde, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?