Cases 1 - 10 of 40
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MOYER
as 5:2024cv01858
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FRANCINE MOYER
USA v. Joseph Willard
as 23-2678
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH WILLARD, also known as Joseph Moyer, also known as Jay Michaels
NELSON et al v. CLAUSSEN et al
as 3:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL NELSON, SARAH E. HEARN-NELSON and PAULINA GIRALDO-JAMES
Defendant:
DON CLAUSSEN, DEREK DEBREE, MARISHA BARLATHER SIROIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NELSON et al v. CLAUSSEN et al
as 2:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL NELSON, SARAH NELSON and PAULINA GIRALDO-JAMES
Defendant:
DON CLAUSSEN, DEREK DEBREE, MARISHA SIROIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lavond HillIn re: Lavond Hill
as 21-1783
Respondent:
J. JONES, JOHN E. WETZEL, D. CLOSE and others
Petitioner:
In re: LAVOND HILL
SHARP v. COLLECTORS UNIVERSE, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv20594
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. ORLANDO, JENNIFER H. LEUER, JON M. SULLIVAN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHARP
PALKON v. COLLECTORS UNIVERSE INC et al
as 5:2020cv06487
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. ORLANDO, JENNIFER H. LEUER, COLLECTORS UNIVERSE INC and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS PALKON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PALKON v. COLLECTORS UNIVERSE INC et al
as 2:2020cv06487
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. ORLANDO, JENNIFER H. LEUER, COLLECTORS UNIVERSE INC and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS PALKON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roscoe Chambers v. David Ebbert, et al
as 20-3472
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MOYER, WARDEN DAVID J EBBERT, CERNEY, DHO Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Debtor / Appellee:
OLSHESKIE
Carlton Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 20-3276
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ROY ORMAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STEESE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
