Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Miles v. Sands
as 1:2023cv06299
Plaintiff:
Gregory Miles
Defendant:
Rikers Island OBCC, Capt. Sands and Mr. G
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06274
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Tropica Fresh v. Mr. G International Produce Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Marco Antonio Gomez, Mr. G International Produce Inc., Antonio Gomez and others
Plaintiff:
Tropica Fresh
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Oshintayo v. Jones
as 9:2019cv01249
Petitioner:
Stanley T. Oshintayo and Stanley Oshintayo
Respondent:
Mr. G. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WP Produce Corporation v. Mr. G International Produce Inc et al
as 1:2017cv09905
Plaintiff:
WP Produce Corporation
Defendant:
Mr. G International Produce Inc. and Jose A. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tama Tropical Inc. v. Mr. G International Produce Inc et al
as 1:2016cv02635
Plaintiff:
Tama Tropical Inc.
Defendant:
Mr. G International Produce Inc , Desh Deepak Bhardwat and Jaswinder Singh
Counter_claimant:
Mr. G International Produce Inc
Counter_defendant:
Tama Tropical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cortez v. Badore et al
as 9:2013cv01391
Plaintiff:
Fredo Cortez
Defendant:
K. Badore, J. Walker, Mr. McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Associated Produce Inc. v. Mr. G. International Produce Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05496
Plaintiff:
Associated Produce Inc.
Defendant:
Mr. G. International Produce Inc. and Antonio Smith
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
