Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Baez v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Baez and David Baez
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Levine et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Levine, David Levine and Dawn Marie Levine
Defendant:
FOREST RIVER, INC and Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE et al v. D INSTALLATION LLC f/k/a MR. DAVID'S FLOORING INTERNATIONAL, LLC
as 1:2022cv01262
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE, BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND and others
Defendant:
D INSTALLATION LLC f/k/a MR. DAVID'S FLOORING INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
KNOWLES, et al v. MR. DAVID'S FLOORING INTERNATIONAL, LLC
as 1:2018cv01951
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS AND TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, INDIANAPOLIS PENSION FUND, BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND (AS SUCCESSOR TO BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND) and others
Defendant:
MR. DAVID'S FLOORING INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HECKING v. NEW HAMPSHIRE CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Defendant:
ATTY. MS. "PAT", MS. KELLY AYOTTE, MS. KATHRYN BARGER and others
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
STUDNICKA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, DEFENDANTS et al
as 2:2010cv00259
Defendant:
ANNONYMOUS, ANONYMOUS, ANYNOMUS and others
Plaintiff:
MR. SEAN ALLEN STUDNICKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUDNICKA et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2010cv00137
Defendant:
MS. BIEGLEY, MR. BOBO, A. W. DEBRAIN and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN A. STUDNICKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
