Cases 11 - 20 of 290
Pooler v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00193
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Enrico George, Joseph Hooker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Pooler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pooler v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00131
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, E. George, Joseph Hooker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Pooler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00106
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Matthew Gamble, Randy L. Lavespere and others
Plaintiff:
Lacal Lucky Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00010
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and Jeff Landry
Petitioner:
Billy Patton
Defendant - Consolidated:
Darryl Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00027
Defendant:
Kevin Benjamin, Cody Butler, N. Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00856
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Chris Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00827
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
Larry Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00795
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
George Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hammond v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00796
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Ronnie Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lloyd v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00768
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
Ontario Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
