Cases 1 - 10 of 290
Savoy v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00006
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary and N. Burl Cain
Plaintiff:
Justin Savoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
England v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2018cv01031
Defendant:
Saundra Rosso, N. Burl Cain, James M LeBlanc and others
Respondent:
Mrs Lamertiniere
Plaintiff:
Carl England
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lavergne v. Stutes et al
as 3:2018cv00693
Defendant:
Michael Harson, Herman Clause, Keith Stutes and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon S. Lavergne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaVergne v. Stutes et al
as 3:2017cv01696
Defendant:
N Burl Cain, Herman Clause, Burliegh Doga and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon S. LaVergne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. Landry et al
as 3:2017cv00497
Respondent:
N Burl Cain and Jeff Landry
Petitioner:
Kirk Mosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2016cv00826
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, James LeBlanc, Darrel Vannoy and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaspard v. Robert et al
as 3:2016cv00788
Defendant:
Sam Adams, Michael Aloise, Jr., Ricky L. Babin and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Gaspard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Offord v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2016cv00461
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, John Doe, Unknown Dozart and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie Offord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00460
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain and James LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Robert LaTroy White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tasby v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00277
Defendant:
David Ankenbrand, N. Burl Cain, Carol Duthu and others
Plaintiff:
Vidale Tasby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
