Cases 41 - 50 of 689
Armando Munoz v. James Tilton, et al
as 13-16203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO V. MUNOZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TILTON, JEANNE S. WOODFORD, SUZAN HUBBARD, Warden and others
Earnest Woods, II v. Ben Curry, et al
as 13-16045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, N. GRANNIS, AUNG and others
Gregory Norwood v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-15970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY LYNN NORWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATE, Director of Prisons, KENNETH CLARK, Warden, K. ALLISON, Warden and others
Vincent Solomon v. M. Carrasco, et al
as 13-15901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT U. SOLOMON
Defendant - Appellee:
M. CARRASCO, J. HEIL, C. TURNER and others
Glen Robison v. Paramvir Sahota, et al
as 13-15151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLEN W. ROBISON
Defendant - Appellee:
PARAMVIR SAHOTA, M.D., Chief Medical Officer C.O.M., MOON. JEU, M.D., I. CARDINO and others
Young v. Valdez et al
as 4:2013cv00312
Plaintiff:
Toraino L. Young
Defendant:
M. Valdez, M. Mendon, R. L. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel Shotwell v. S. Brandt, et al
as 13-15136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL SHOTWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
S. BRANDT, Lieutenant at High Security & Transitional Housing, D. GARCIA, SVSP Correctional Officer, S. CELAYA, SVSP Correctional Officer and others
Bernard Hamilton v. USDC-CAOAK
as 13-70011
:
In re: BERNARD LEE HAMILTON
Petitioner:
BERNARD LEE HAMILTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
ADAMIK, Officer, WHITSON, Sergeant, T. LEE, Sergeant and others
Ronald Bratton v. Ben Curry, et al
as 12-17838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BRATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, E. KLEIN, A. JANNAH and others
Billy Birdwell, II v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-17345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY PAUL BIRDWELL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, N. GRANNIS, R. SUBIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
