Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 289
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. USDOI, et al
as 22-15537
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, STATE OF UTAH and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION and others
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. USDOI, et al
as 22-15536
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, STATE OF UTAH and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION and others
Sierra Club et al v. Regan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv06956
Plaintiff: Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council and Environmental Integrity Project
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Natural Resources Defense Coun v. American Farm Bureau Federatio, et al
as 21-16384
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and STATE OF UTAH
Petitioner / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, SPORTSMENS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION and others
Downwinders At Risk et al v. Regan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv03551
Plaintiff: Earthworks, Environmental Defense Fund, Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services and others
Defendant: Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Migrant Clinicians Network, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 21-70719
Petitioner: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, FARMWORKER JUSTICE and others
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
County of Santa Clara, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 21-70558
Petitioner: AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST and others
Respondent: NORRIS COCHRAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
County of Santa Clara et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2021cv01655
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Norris Cochran
Plaintiff: Center for Science in the Public Interest, County of Santa Clara, National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 4:2021cv00561
Defendant: United States Fish And Wildlife Service and United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff: Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Center for Biological Diversity v. Bernhardt
as 1:2021cv00041
Defendant: David Bernhardt and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff: Sierra Club, Wildearth Guardians, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?