Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Neal v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv00141
Petitioner:
Michael Neal
Respondent:
David Pierce and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neal v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01978
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline C. Neal
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
North v. China Intelligent Lighting & Electronics Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00302
Plaintiff:
Neal North
Defendant:
China Intelligent Lighting & Electronics Inc., Li Xuemei, Wu Shiliang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Epperson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00738
Plaintiff:
Kevin S. Epperson
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Chaplain Frank Pennell, Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rainier v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00498
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Rainier, Sr.
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl Danberg, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Beckles et al
as 1:2009cv00637
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Beckles, Neal, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Old Ladder Litigation Co. LLC et al v. Investcorp Bank BSC et al
as 1:2008cv00778
Plaintiff:
Old Ladder Litigation Co. LLC and Craig H. Averch
Defendant:
Investcorp Bank BSC, Investcorp S A, Investcorp International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hsu v. Wolpoff & Abramson L.L.P. et al
as 1:2008cv00293
Plaintiff:
Lifeng Lee Hsu
Defendant:
Wolpoff & Abramson L.L.P., Great Seneca Financial Corp., Palisades Acquistion XVI LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
