Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fisher v. Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sally Fisher
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Andrew Ginther, Ned Pettus, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Spragling, II v. Akron Public Schools et al
as 5:2018cv01969
Defendant:
Superintendent Jeff Ferguson, Akron Public Schools, Tallmadge City Schools and others
Plaintiff:
Ned Spragling, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. Village of Enon et al
as 3:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Larry Ned Clark and Mary Kathryn Clark
Defendant:
Village of Enon, Clifford Vernon and Troy Callahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Radcliffe v. Robinson et al
as 2:2010cv00839
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Radcliffe
Defendant:
Monte Robinson, Jeff Happ, City of Columbus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gessic v. Village of Bentleyville et al
as 1:2007cv03201
Plaintiff:
Stephen Scott Gessic
Defendant:
Village of Bentleyville, Harvey Bruner, Debbie Alexlrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
