Cases 1 - 9 of 9
7-Eleven Inc v. Pitstop Enterprises LLC et al
as 3:2026cv02261
Plaintiff:
7-Eleven Inc
Defendant:
Pitstop Enterprises LLC and Antonio Da Rocha Campos Neto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00277
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00263
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. v. Ferreira-Neto, Jr.
as 1:2019cv00348
Defendant:
Yusley Ferreira-Neto, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
Weatherly et al v. Pershing LLC
as 3:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Patsy Weatherly , Edith Wichman , Michelle Morrison and others
Defendant:
Pershing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neto et al v. Dmcc Enterprise Inc et al
as 3:2013cv03528
Plaintiff:
Jose Bernardo Neto , Fernando Lopez De Oliveira and Francisco Oliveira
Defendant:
Dmcc Enterprise Inc and Meei Ling Chu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heggemeier v. Caldwell County, Texas et al
as 1:2013cv00746
Defendant:
Caldwell County Commissioners Court, Caldwell County, Texas, Ernesto "Neto" Madrigal and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Heggemeier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sonintel Sociedade National De Industria Telecomunicacoes Ltda et al v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 4:2010cv02107
Plaintiff:
Sonintel Sociedade National De Industria Telecomunicacoes Ltda, Jose Daniel Martin Catoira, Affonso Feijo Da Costa Neto and others
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States , AT&T Inc , Edward E Whitacre, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
