Cases 1 - 10 of 2,564
Pollak v. Strong et al
as 1:2024cv00494
Defendant:
Lillian McKenzie Strong, Eyebabe LLC, Lillian Strong and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Pollak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00497
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Hoyt v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoyt
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clements v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
James Clements
Respondent:
Hector Rios and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. New Mexico Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Robert Barrett
Defendant:
New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Frankie Maldonado
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chino v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Earl Chino
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lujan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lynn Manning
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Dominic Sanchez
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
