Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Quakerbridge Early Learning v. Selective Insurance Co, et al
as 21-1719
Defendant / Appellee: SELECTIVE INSURANCE CO OF NEW ENGLAND, SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP INC
Plaintiff / Appellant: QUAKERBRIDGE EARLY LEARNING LLC, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, d/b/a Kiddie Academy of Hamilton
First State Insurance Company v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
as 21-30
Counter Claimant: Swiss Reinsurance America Company, Successor, Forum Insurance Co., ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Central National Insurance Company of Omaha
Defendant: Doe Insurers, 1 through 10, Columbia Casualty Company, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff: First State Insurance Company, New England Reinsurance Corporation
Defendant / Appellant: Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., Successor, Familian Corporation
Defendant / Appellee: American Home Assurance Company, Oakwood Insurance Company, as successor by merger to Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, but only as to policies issued by Cravens, Dargan & Company, Pacific Coast, and its subsidiaries, Swiss Reinsurance America Company, Successor, Forum Insurance Company
Pennsylvania National Mutual C v. New England Reinsurance Corp, et al
as 20-1872
Intervenor: EVEREST REINSURANCE CO
Defendant / Appellee: NEW ENGLAND REINSURANCE CORP, HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO
Plaintiff / Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE GROUP
Pennsylvania National Mutual C v. New England Reinsurance Corpor, et al
as 20-1635
Defendant / Appellee: NEW ENGLAND REINSURANCE CORP
Plaintiff / Appellant: PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE GROUP
Intervenor / Appellee: EVEREST REINSURANCE CO
Defendant: HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00305
Defendant: Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford, Maximum Casualty Insurance Company, New England Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC
Cause Of Action: HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Type: Contract Insurance
Emhart Industries, Inc., et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant: ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant: NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC., STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Not Yet Classified: EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, BLACK & DECKER, INC., UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant / Appellee: US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party: DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC
Silva v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00197
Defendant: Kolmar Laboratories, Inc., Southwest Holdings, LLC, Procter & Gamble and others
Plaintiff: Maria Silva
Cause Of Action: Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Pennsylvania National Mutual C v. New England Reinsurance Corp, et al
as 19-1805
Not Yet Classified: EVEREST REINSURANCE CO
Defendant: NEW ENGLAND REINSURANCE CORP, HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO
Plaintiff / Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE CO
BRADFORD v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.
as 2:2019cv00128
Defendant: CRANE COMPANY, DEZURIK INC, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: JANICE BRADFORD WEST, MERLE WEST, JANICE E BRADFORD
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
York Insurance Co. of Maine v. Donaco, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00013
Plaintiff: York Insurance Co. of Maine
Defendant: Donaco, Inc., Lisa Doggart, New England Homes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?