Cases 1 - 9 of 9
New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Lee et al
as 3:2020cv01178
Plaintiff:
New Hampshire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Robert A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Barber v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv01631
Defendant:
Hon. Judge Simon, Attorney General of North Carolina, Attorney General of West Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Lee et al
as 6:2019cv00534
Plaintiff:
New Hampshire Insurance Company
Defendant:
The F/V Pacific Hunter and Robert A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Lee et al
as 3:2019cv00534
Plaintiff:
New Hampshire Insurance Company
Defendant:
The F/V Pacific Hunter and Robert A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barber et al v. Oregon et al
as 3:2018cv00855
Defendant:
Alabama, Arkansas, California and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jay Barber, Chad Dykehouse, Jay David Leatherwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Monarch Transportation Services, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00874
Defendant:
D.M. Freight Services and Monarch Transportation Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
New Hampshire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Don Lulay Homes, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Company et al
as 6:2012cv02283
Plaintiff:
Don Lulay Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Granite State Insurance Company, Illinois National Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Garrett v. New Hampshire Insurance Company
as 3:2011cv00788
Plaintiff:
Wesley James Garrett
Defendant:
New Hampshire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
