Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Robert Kerson, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 10-80087
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ROBERT KERSON, FREDERICK ROZO, MICHAEL FRANCIS AYERS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Crago Corporation, et al v. Sharp Corporation, et al
as 10-80088
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CRAGO CORPORATION, ORION HOME SYSTEMS LLC, NATHAN MUCHNICK, INC. and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
SHARP CORPORATION, SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00117
Not Classified By Court:
Viewsonic Corporation and Nassau Suffolk Lumber & Supply
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Giordan, Electrograph Technologies, Corp. and Electrograph Systems, Inc.
Claimant:
State Board of Equalization of the State of California
Intervenor:
NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv05840
Plaintiff:
Motorola, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Motorola, Inc. and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv04997
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ATS Claim, LLC v. Epson Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01115
Plaintiff:
ATS Claim, LLC
Defendant:
Epson Electronics America, Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
