Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Bowers, NFN Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-10287
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, R. Bowers, Sr Warden, NFN Wonders and others
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Bowers, NFN Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2022cv02758
Petitioner:
Kevin Jones and Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, NFN Bowers, NFN Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv02559
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
NFN Bowers, NFN Wonders, NFN Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Simmons
as 22-10901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
NFN Simmons, Captain, NFN Ward, Captain, D. Wonders and others
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
NFN Bowers, NFN Wonders, NFN Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Simmons et al
as 3:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
NFN Simmons, NFN Ward, D Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2021cv01906
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Moore, D Wunders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marion v. Tubbs et al
as 2:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Marion
Defendant:
NFN Tubbs, S Gonzales, NFN Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
