Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Del Pino et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv03911
Plaintiff: James Del Pino and Beverly I. Del Pino
Defendant: 3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company, Abb Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Del Pino et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02928
Plaintiff: James Del Pino and Beverly I. Del Pino
Defendant: 3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company, Abb Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosalie Jean Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00811
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps, Inc: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To The Delaval Separator Company: Alfa Laval Inc
Ued As Successor-in-interest To Thursh Company And H.A. Thrush Company: Amtrol Inc
Defendant: Armstrong International Inc, CLA-VAL Co, Cameron International Corporation and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chapman Valve Company, Deming Pump Company, Jenkin: Crane Co
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company: Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Sierra Talc Company And United Talc Company: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu: FMC Corporation
Ued As Successor To Edward Valve, Inc: Flowserve US Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Henry Valve Co: Henry Technologies Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Delaval Turbine, Inc., And C.H. Wheeler Manufactur: IMO Industries
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Robertshaw Controls Company Dba Fulton Sylphon Val: Invensys Systems Inc
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson
Ued Successor-in-interest To Klipfel Valves, Inc: O C Keckley Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To International Talc Company: RT Vanderbilt Company Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries, Inc: Zurn Industries LLC
Nelson et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00793
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amtrol Inc and others
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson and Rosalie Jean Nelson
King et al v. A.O.Smith Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv04921
Plaintiff: Hazel King , Lori King , Teri Parslow and others
Defendant: A.O.Smith Corp., A.W. Chesterton Company, Advocate Mines, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera, et al v. Nibco Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1999cv06443
Plaintiff: Martha Rivera , Mao Her , Alicia Alvarez and others
Defendant: Nibco Inc
Movant: James Drexinger , Joseph Gross , Dennis J Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stayton v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01514
Plaintiff: Virgie Stayton and Virgie Stayton
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, American Standard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-15136
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Shin-Etsu Handotai America Inc v. Nibco Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv05032
Plaintiff: Shin-Etsu Handotai America Inc and Shin-Etsu Handotai America Inc
Defendant: Nibco Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
John Lusk et al v. A.B. Boyd Co. et al
as 2:2008cv07548
Plaintiff: John Lusk, John Lusk, John Lusk and others
Defendant: A.B. Boyd Co., A. O. Smith Corporation, National Steel and Shipbuilding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?