Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Elmore Nichols, Jr. v. Fredeane Artis
as 23-1990
Petitioner / Appellant: ELMORE NICHOLS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: FREDEANE ARTIS
Ramon Boyce v. City Hall for Springfield, OH, et al
as 23-3533
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAMON BOYCE
Defendant / Appellee: CITY HALL FOR SPRINGFIELD, OH, DAVID ANDREW WILSON, Senior Policy Advisor/Criminal Justice, CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1499
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Matthew Nichols v. William Dwyer, et al
as 23-1476
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW NICHOLS
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM DWYER and CITY OF WARREN, MI
Defendant: JAMES R. FOUTS
Danny Nichols, Jr. v. Kaure, et al
as 23-1387
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANNY ALBERT NICHOLS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: NURSE PRACTITIONER KAURE, JODI DEANGELO, Warden, DR. VINDHYA JAYAWARDENA and others
Sherenia Moody, et al v. Clarence Foster, III
as 23-5317
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHERENIA MOODY, individually and as next-of-kin to the deceased, Eugene Moody and NATALIE NICHOLE MOODY, individually and as next-of-kin to the deceased, Eugene Moody
Defendant / Appellee: CLARENCE EARL FOSTER, III and CLARENCE EARL FOSTER, III, M.D.
Roy NicholsIn re: Roy Nichols
as 23-3240
Petitioner: In re: ROY ALLEN NICHOLS
Thomas Nichols v. USA
as 23-5181
Petitioner / Appellant: THOMAS ALBERT NICHOLS
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Melvin King, III v. Ta'Kisha Fitzgerald, et al
as 23-5155
Plaintiff / Appellant: MELVIN R. KING, III
Defendant / Appellee: TA'KISHA FITZGERALD, STEVEN W. SWORD, RANDALL E. NICHOLS and others
Jeffrey Nichols v. Joshua Allabach, et al
as 22-1366
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEFFREY NICHOLS
Defendant / Appellee: JOSHUA ALLABACH and BRANDON DAHL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?