Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CARTER v. NJ PAROLE BOARD-TRENTON N.J. et al
as 3:2023cv01393
Plaintiff:
HENRY CARTER
Defendant:
NJ PAROLE BOARD-TRENTON N.J. and NJ PAROLE BOARD-NEWARK (HALSEY ST) N.J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. NJ PAROLE
as 3:2017cv03266
Plaintiff:
GERON SMITH
Defendant:
NJ PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHMOND v. NJ PAROLE
as 3:2017cv02363
Plaintiff:
DAVID RICHMOND
Defendant:
NJ PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Slaughter, et al v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 16-1121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES S. SLAUGHTER
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
THOMAS LIDDELL, SHANE SIMPSON, DANIEL STRYKER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, Governor, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY, President of NJ Senate, VINCENT PRIETO, Speaker of NJ Assembly and others
SAINES v. NJ PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2014cv07317
Petitioner:
PARIS SAINES
Respondent:
NJ PAROLE BOARD, WARDEN, CRAF and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KUSHNER v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2014cv03709
Petitioner:
LARRY J. KUSHNER
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NJ PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NERI v. MID STATE et al
as 1:2013cv04555
Petitioner:
PHILIP G. NERI
Respondent:
MID STATE, D.O.C. and NJ PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ronald C. Jones v. NJ Parole Board, et al
as 11-2860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
NJ PAROLE BOARD, LARRY GLOVER and ATTY GEN NJ
COHEN v. NJ PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2011cv01924
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE J. COHEN
Defendant:
NJ PAROLE BOARD and JULIENNE SIRICO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Aruanno v. John Corzine, et al
as 10-3949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN S CORZINE, RICHARD CODEY, JOHN O. BENNETT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
