Cases 1 - 10 of 10
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT FACILITIES FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE ACROSS PROPERTY IN SUFFOLK COUNTY, VIRGINIA et al
as 2:2019cv00638
Defendant:
RYCA, L.L.C., UNKNOWN PERSONS AND INTERESTED PARTIES and EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT FACILITIES FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE ACROSS PROPERTY IN SUFFOLK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Plaintiff:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Jacob Engineering Group Inc. et al v. Capefirst Funding, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01302
Defendant:
Westfields Holdings, LLC, Investor Recovery Trust Capefirst Advisors, LLC, Trustee, Capefirst Advisors, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Blue Canopy Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Lumber Liquidators Chinese-Manufactured Flooring Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2015md02627
Plaintiff:
Dwight Spence, Tracie-Linn Tyrrell, Frank Graham and others
In Re:
In Re: Lumber Liquidators Chinese-Manufactured Flooring Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Defendant:
EDLab Environmental Diagnostics Laboratory, Lumber Liquidators, Unknown Parties and others
Interested Party:
Brice M. Johnston and Diana Cantu-Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Easements to Construct Facilities for the Maintenance and Operation of Gas Transmission Pipeline Across Property in Warren County, Virginia et al
as 5:2012cv00082
Tax Map Nos. 12A-116-28 And 12-32C:
Cedarville, LLC
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Tax Map Nos. 12-68, 12-80, And 12-79:
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company
Defendant:
Easements to Construct Facilities for the Maintenance and Operation of Gas Transmission Pipeline Across Property in Warren County, Virginia and Unknown Persons and Interested Parties
Tax Map Nos. 12-32A5C And 12-32A4A:
Rappahannock Electric Cooperative
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Thomas v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2012cv00068
Defendant:
Christopher Arnold, Shari R. Avenius, Helen E. Brand and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Thomas v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2012cv00050
Defendant:
Christopher Arnold, Shari R. Avenius, Helen E. Brand and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. 38,556 Square Feet of Space Located on the 10th and 11th Floors in the Premises Known as 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia et al
as 1:2008cv00347
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
38,556 Square Feet of Space Located on the 10th and 11th Floors in the Premises Known as 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia, Parties in Interest of Such Space and 1000-1100 Wilson Owner LLC
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 26 Inch Transmission Pipeline Across Properties in Fauquier County, Virginia et al
as 1:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation
Defendant:
An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 26 Inch Transmission Pipeline Across Properties in Fauquier County, Virginia and Unknown Persons and Interested Parties
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717 Natural Gas Act - Land Condemnation
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Walker et al
as 3:2007cv00028
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation
Defendant:
Michael E. Walker, Alan D. Ward, Norma J. Caron and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Page County, Virginia et al
as 5:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation
Defendant:
Glen W. Turner, Sandra L. Turner, Rosa A. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
