Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Brown v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02469
Plaintiff:
Milous Brown
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ernie L Moore, Brian J Niceswanger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Austin v. Ashcraft et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jason Andrew Austin
Defendant:
James Ashcraft, Demetrius Yates, John Boykin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Powers v. Eddy
as 2:2021cv01195
Defendant:
Andrew Eddy, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Floyd Powers
Interested Party:
State of Ohio -Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edge v. Mahlman et al
as 1:2020cv00892
Defendant:
C.O. Wellman, C.O. D. Taylor, C.O. Harr and others
Plaintiff:
Le'Sean Edge
Interested Party:
Interested Party State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2020cv00769
Defendant:
Major Galloway, John Doe 1-3, Officer Gullet and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffmeyer v. Ohio Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00752
Defendant:
DRC Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Harris, Mr. Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hoffmeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2020cv03879
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, H. May, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Alford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Chambers-Smith
as 4:2020cv01583
Plaintiff:
James A. Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith
Interested Party:
Interested Party State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. NEOCC et al
as 4:2017cv01545
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
NEOCC, CCA/Core Civic, Captain Dragovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
