Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Quezada Aguina et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
Maria Tayde Quezada Aguina and Ramon Socorro Urbina Morquecho
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, Ur Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tanner v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Joelle Tanner
Defendant:
Nolan Jenkins and Lehi City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Al-Jaddou v. No Named Respondent
as 20-1433
Petitioner / Appellant:
NOLAN AL-JADDOU
Respondent / Appellee:
NO NAMED RESPONDENT
United States v. Nolan
as 20-1021
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT CHAD NOLAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hafen v. Carlisle et al
as 2:2019cv00908
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Kirby C. Jensen, Cindy C. Jensen, Cathy C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
United States v. Nolan
as 19-6106
Defendant / Appellant:
VERNON JEFFREY NOLAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Springer et al v. Zions Bancorporation
as 2:2019cv00035
Plaintiff:
Lexi Rolfe, Brian Mallroy, Denise Murdock and others
Defendant:
Zions Bancorporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Gregory et al v. Zions Bancorporation
as 2:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Wayne Baker, Mike Israel, Stephen Beverley and others
Defendant:
Zions Bancorporation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Corey Thurman, Edward Terry, JDH Family LTD Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Nolan-Bey v. McPherson County Court et al
as 6:2017cv01278
Plaintiff:
Marques Nolan-Bey
Defendant:
McPherson County Court, Richard B. Walker, David Page and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galt Ventures, Inc. v. Nolan
as 6:2017cv01206
Plaintiff:
Galt Ventures, Inc.
Defendant:
Marques V. Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
