Cases 61 - 70 of 182
TMI Solutions LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00967
Plaintiff:
TMI Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Gold Value International v. Sanctuary Clothing, LLC, et al
as 17-55818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GOLD VALUE INTERNATIONAL TEXTILE, INC., a California Corporation, DBA Fiesta Fabric
Defendant - Appellee:
SANCTUARY CLOTHING, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, AMAZON.COM, INC., a Washington Corporation, MACY'S, INC., an Ohio Corporation and others
Neman Brothers & Assoc., Inc. v. ZZ Fashion Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03452
Defendant:
DOES, Nordstrom, Inc. and ZZ Fashion Corp.
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers and Associates, Inc.
Wongab Corporation v. Nordstrom Inc et al
as 2:2017cv02974
Defendant:
Does, Halogen, Interzan LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Wongab Corporation
Erik Brunetti v. Arcadia Group USA Limited et al
as 8:2017cv00545
Defendant:
Arcadia Group USA Limited, Nordstrom, Inc. and Project Social T, LLC
Plaintiff:
Erik Brunetti
Tianhai Lace USA Inc v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01296
Plaintiff:
Tianhai Lace USA Inc
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tangelo IP, LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tangelo IP, LLC
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01332
Plaintiff:
Geographic Location Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09260
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc., Jenny Yoo Collection, Inc. and DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
Klauber Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Gold Value International Textile Inc. v. Bernard Chaus Inc et al
as 2:2016cv08421
Defendant:
Belk Inc, Bernard Chaus Inc, Bloomingdale's Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gold Value International Textile Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
