Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Williamson v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-8015
Petitioner: BRAEDEN WILLIAMSON
Respondent: WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDIUM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDEN, AKA Seth Norris and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Johnson v. Chapin, et al
as 24-1010
Plaintiff: JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant: DAVID CHAPIN, JESSICA AGGSON, FNU STEIN, Lt. and others
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant: JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Armajo v. State of Wyoming, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-8052
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDIUM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDEN, in his official capacity, AKA Seth Norris and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rhodes v. Shannon, et al
as 23-8026
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARTY W. RHODES
Defendant / Appellee: DANIEL SHANNON, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, EDDIE WILSON, Wyoming Department of Corrections Prison Administrator, SETH NORRIS, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Deputy Warden and others
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant: JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Johnson v. Rumph, et al
as 23-1028
Plaintiff / Appellant: JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: RUMPH, PAPPAY, FLORES and others
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 22-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant: JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: JUDGE JILL BRADY, JESSICA AGGSON, DAVID CHAPIN and others
Johnson v. Meckelburg, et al
as 22-1418
Plaintiff / Appellant: JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: MECKELBURG, DELOACH, NORRIS and others
Salway v. Norris
as 21-8055
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRAVIS SALWAY
Defendant / Appellee: ERIC NORRIS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?