Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Poole v. Darden
as 1:2023cv02770
Petitioner: William Norris Poole, Jr.
Respondent: Deborah Darden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lemus Berrios v. Gouff et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff: Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Defendant: Brian Gouff, Kenneth Hardman, Ms. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Weber et al
as 1:2021cv00353
Defendant: Moore, Wuestneck, Thornton and others
Plaintiff: Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02916
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamilton v. Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2018cv02756
Defendant: R. Nauon, Board of Commissioners, Thomas Hall and others
Plaintiff: Larry Hamilton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brawner v. USA - 2255 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv03453
Petitioner: Jhonte Norris Brawner, Jr.
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cascio v. State of Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2009cv01938
Plaintiff: Harry James Cascio
Defendant: State of Maryland, Govt. of Baltimore County, Norris Byrnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cascio v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2009cv01096
Plaintiff: Harry J. Cascio
Defendant: State of Maryland, Government of Baltimore County Maryland, Norris Byrnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Haven et al
as 1:2008cv01907
Petitioner: Robert Lee Norris
Respondent: D. Haven and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arnold v. Norris
as 1:2008cv01227
Plaintiff: James G. Arnold
Defendant: Sammy Norris
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?