Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Norris v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Rinaldo Eugene Norris
Defendant:
Jessie Williams, Bobby Tyler, Kimberly Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Mississippi State Peneteniary
as 4:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Steven Richard Norris
Defendant:
Mississippi State Peneteniary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Norris v. Mississippi State Penitentiary
as 5:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
Steven Richard Norris
Defendant:
Mississippi State Penitentiary
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00533
Defendant:
Centurion of Mississippi, Inc., Unknown Nagel, Norris Hogans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jason Bruce Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Hogan et al
as 3:2018cv00461
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Corey O'Neal Sims
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Norris Hogan, Quincy Dukes and D. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Burkes et al
as 3:2018cv00416
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Jones, Warden Unknown Rice, Captain Unknown Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Gary Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Shaw et al
as 3:2018cv00379
Plaintiff:
Anthony Armstrong
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Norris Hogan, D. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Hogan et al
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Ronald Moore
Defendant:
Norris Hogan, D.H.O. Chapman and Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Hogan et al
as 3:2018cv00243
Plaintiff:
Corey O'Neal Sims
Defendant:
Norris Hogan, D. Chapman and Quincy Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbin v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00676
Plaintiff:
Kunta Kinta Harbin
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Unknown Stewart, Unknown Townsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
