Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Norton v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01835
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norton v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01765
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norton v. Grasley et al
as 3:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Barnes Grasley and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Richard Francis Weaver
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Moriam Balogun, Leland P. Beamer, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Norton v. Marten Transport, LTD. et al
as 3:2023cv00336
Defendant:
Clarita L. McBride, Marten Transport, LTD., Marten Transport Services, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Sabrina F Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Norton v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pico v. Cooke et al
as 6:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Marcos Andres Pico
Defendant:
Shari Cooke, Michelle Messenger, Karon Stanek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker-Norton v. Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv01796
Plaintiff:
Janet Kimberly Walker-Norton
Defendant:
Standard Fire Insurance Company a foreign business corporation doing business as Travelers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singh v. Lynch et al
as 6:2021cv01124
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Defendant:
Krysta Lynch, Oregon Department of Corrections, L. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
